Re: unbound and resolvconf: have you tried debian support channels?

[Dysmas de Lassus via Unbound-users]

Hello Ron, perhaps I was not enough precise in my question which concerns unbound. The question is : Is the unbound-resolvconf.service necessary in any way for Unbound, or is this only a help in case resolvconf is installed ? Thanks Le 14/02/2020 à 10:22, Ron Varburg a écrit : Does Armbian Buster Debian Buster on Armbian board? If so I think you might try asking on the debian-user mailing list, and other debian support channels. As well as on Armbian forums. Hopefully, other participants of this list will be able to better assists. On Friday, February 14, 2020, 03:07:30 AM GMT+1, dy1977--- via Unbound-users <unbound-users@lists.nlnetlabs.nl> wrote: Hello, Since I want that local DNS request are served by unbound, I disabled the DNS resolving in Network Manager, and I uninstalled resolvconf to prevent it to modify the resolv.conf file, which is fixed to nameserver  127.0.0.1 But this provokes the following message when unbound starts : Started Unbound DNS server. Feb 13 16:23:42 localhost systemd[1]: Condition check resulted in Unbound DNS server via resolvconf being skipped. Is this a problem ? I ask because I have two systems. The first one continue to work normally with resolvconf uninstalled, I have a problem on the second. I don't think it is linked to resolvconf, but nevertheless I ask. A complementary information : when resolvconf was installed, there was also an error each time unbound started: package-helper[6655]: /etc/resolvconf/update.d/libc: Warning: /etc/resolv.conf is not a symbolic link to /etc/resolvconf/run/resolv.conf It is true on Armbian Buster. Nevertheless sometimes resolvconf was editing directly /etc/resolvconf, it was visible from the header. If this is not correct, then what is the right way to force local DNS requests to pass through unbound ? Thanks in advance. Dysmas