Paul, Thanks for the response. While you didn’t address the specific question you did point me to the right solution. :) One clarification to not besmirch the good folks at Tailscale. They are not using the whole 100.0.0.0/8 address space. They are only using the 100.64.0.0/10 space from RFC6598. And as it is only used internally to their network it won’t in most normal configs conflict with ISP usage of the range. That said, since DNS has no awareness of CIDR, I was trying to “cheat” by being overly broad in my query forwarding by using the larger /8. The proper solution, which you led me to, was to define forward-zones for all 64 “class B” spaces inside the /10 CIDR range. Tedious, but doable. I’m still curious why a /8 didn’t work, but my immediate problem is solved. On Mar 23, 2025, at 02:00, Paul Wouters <p...@nohats.ca> wrote:
|
Re: Domain forward for /8 in-addr.arpa not working
Jeremy Beker via Unbound-users Sun, 23 Mar 2025 04:21:39 -0700
- Domain forward for /8 in-addr.arpa not work... Jeremy Beker via Unbound-users
- Re: Domain forward for /8 in-addr.arpa... Paul Wouters via Unbound-users
- Re: Domain forward for /8 in-addr.... Jeremy Beker via Unbound-users