Ondřej Surý wrote:
> Here's the problem. You are trying to enforce your view, since it's your
> current
> problem. But I hope that's never going to happen in Unbound. We are supposed
> to fixup the old wounds and not open them again and again.
> And I think we are really going offtopic - this is more general DNS issue than
> Unbound specific.
what is unbound specific is that unbound answers rd==0 queries which IMO
it should not and which made this entire pointless thread possible.
(dnscache seems to have not suffered for its decision to drop all rd==0
queries on the floor.)
other examples of user stupidity include publishing howtos like this:
http://www.howtoforge.com/installing-using-unbound-nameserver-on-debian-etch
which recommends the following ACL:
access-control: 0.0.0.0/0 allow
this one is a bit harder to prevent since really obstinate users can ask
for two /1's or four /2's...
--
Robert Edmonds
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
Unbound-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://unbound.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/unbound-users
