-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Attila Nagy wrote: > Hello, > I've made a capture and according to that, it was about 150 ms between > unbound's query and the response. I think it's pretty normal for > nameservers on the other side of the globe.
Yes, however unbound keeps a rtt profile for each server. So if the server has a very fast RTT then unbound will consider 150msec to be very late (for that server), and retries before that time is up. >> So, it is normal that some authority servers are slow. Thus produce >> timeouts. 20 / 4000 is 0.5% of cases for you, this looks very >> reasonable to me. >> > Yes, maybe, my problem is that I can see unanswered queries. If I > understand it correctly, the above situation should not result in a loss > of answer towards the resolver client. No it should not. > And this is my primary concern, because I don't understand why those > queries are left unanswered. Hmm yes that is bad. Can you look in the total counts of queries that unbound produces and see where they end up? Best regards, Wouter -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkonx+EACgkQkDLqNwOhpPgoXQCfR4pK4ImWxZSCulRweQFH2SCV TOIAn0HL0PHnujBK4SfCK/v4UqFR4vpm =OxAV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Unbound-users mailing list [email protected] http://unbound.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/unbound-users
