-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ondřej Surý wrote: > Also if .PR knew that their key is in DLV registry, that should > exchange their key in DLV as well.
I'd rather they just update it in the ITAR, but do so in a manner that is not going to cause an outage. If a TLD asks if they should put their keys both in ISC's DLV and the ITAR, I try to get them to only put it in the ITAR, and we will get it from there. .TH chose to manually manage the key in both places, I don't know exactly why but it's no problem for us either way; we just exclude .TH from our ITAR import if it exists in DLV already. - --Michael -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkqnx7EACgkQ+NNi0s9NRJ1QtQCfSpo3R/bRzkCtjyyYlV27gIrR s1sAoJrVBDta7QwD/5JjdGbsVMGg9wGF =awP6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Unbound-users mailing list [email protected] http://unbound.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/unbound-users
