On 13 okt 2009, at 22.11, Ondřej Surý wrote:
Ultimately though I like the NOTIFY solution best.
And it's direct violation of RFC1996. I wouldn't call it "solution",
but a "hack". While I consider it to be fine for Marcus (it's his
network after all), I would be extremely unhappy to see this in
unbound upstream.
I haven't made any statements regarding this so far, but I will now. I
agree completely with Ondrey here and I would recommend against
implementing cache flush using NOTIFY. there are far better, and
protocol-wise more prudent, ways to implement this feature.
jakob (speaking as one of the original designers of the Unbound
architecture)
_______________________________________________
Unbound-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://unbound.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/unbound-users
