Out of curiocity. Why unbound can't resolve CNAMEs in local-data as it does with other CNAMEs? What is different between local-data and cached data?
If I were to implement that stuff, I'd, probably, use the same cache for both "kinds" of RRs, but for local-data stuff I'd mark them as "permanent". When constructing answer, take CNAME as if it were cached normally, and resolve the target name the usual way. I don't know how it's implemented in unbound. Why the restriction and/or different treatment to start with? Thanks! /mjt _______________________________________________ Unbound-users mailing list [email protected] http://unbound.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/unbound-users
