Hi Wouter, On Tuesday, May 10, 2011 8:57 PM, Wouter wrote: > Hi Likun, Luoce, > > On 05/10/2011 10:04 AM, W.C.A. Wijngaards wrote: > > On 05/10/2011 03:37 AM, Likun Zhang wrote: > >> I did some quick look at the message and rrset cache, a possible > >> solution for it maybe: add a secondary rrset cache for one message > >> cache, that rrset cache only store the soa record got from the > >> negative response, so the soa rrset pointer in message cache can > >> point to normal rrset cache or the secondary rrset cache. > > > >> I don't think it's perfect, but maybe it will lower the change to > >> code. > > > > Yes, I think that is the way to solve this. > > It is fixed in the svn trunk of unbound, for the next version.
Thanks for your work. Likun _______________________________________________ Unbound-users mailing list [email protected] http://unbound.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/unbound-users
