Tks. Em 26 de abril de 2012 06:31, <[email protected]> escreveu:
> > Zitat von Leandro Anjos Moura <[email protected]>: > > > Hi my nickname lamoura. >> >> Guys, help me please. >> >> I have two servers : >> 1º - 8 cores, 16 gb ram >> 2º - 16 cores, 16 gb ram >> >> What best values for the options below? >> >> # some optimisation options. >> server: >> # use all CPUs >> num-threads: <number of cores> >> >> # power of 2 close to num-threads >> msg-cache-slabs: <same> >> rrset-cache-slabs: <same> >> infra-cache-slabs: <same> >> key-cache-slabs: <same> >> >> # more cache memory, rrset=msg*2 >> rrset-cache-size: 100m >> msg-cache-size: 50m >> >> # more outgoing connections >> # depends on number of cores: 1024/cores - 50 >> outgoing-range: 950 >> >> # Larger socket buffer. OS may need config. >> so-rcvbuf: 4m >> so-sndbuf: 4m >> >> > Hello > > i guess you have already read http://www.unbound.net/** > documentation/howto_optimise.**html<http://www.unbound.net/documentation/howto_optimise.html>. > The question remain what your servers are used for. If you use them as > caching resolver for a larger number of clients you should use a libevent > enabled version of unbound and raise the outgoing-range and > num-queries-per-thread. > > Regards > > Andreas > > > > ______________________________**_________________ > Unbound-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://unbound.nlnetlabs.nl/**mailman/listinfo/unbound-users<http://unbound.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/unbound-users> >
_______________________________________________ Unbound-users mailing list [email protected] http://unbound.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/unbound-users
