Zitat von "W.C.A. Wijngaards" <[email protected]>:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Andreas,

On 07/09/2012 10:52 PM, [email protected] wrote:
Hello

we have on our border dns recursor (unbound 1.4.17) some
stub-zones mostly for PTR lookups for our internal AS112 addresses
like this:

stub-zone: name: "10.in-addr.arpa" stub-addr:
<IP-first-internal-NS> stub-addr: <IP-second-internal-NS>

unbound will divide the load amongst the addresses.
It will randomise with RTT banding.

Today the first internal NS went down and most reverse lookups slow
to crawl. I expexted unbound would notice the failure and simply
only use the second after some time like it did with normal lookups
when skipping unavailable NS.

Is this expected behaviour or have i done something wrong?

The second server also fails?

Unbound should try both servers (randomly if they are working, for 50%
load on both of them).


No, the second was available, and yes it looks like Unbound was balancing because some lookups where fast and some timeout. As far as i know Unbound does skip unresponsive servers when doing "normal" lookups (no stub-zones) and i suspected Unbound doing the same for the stub-zone servers. Might this be possible as a feature in the future? I think the same rules should apply for stub-zones as for all lookups, no?

Regards

Andreas



_______________________________________________
Unbound-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://unbound.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/unbound-users

Reply via email to