On 31 Aug 2012, at 09:56, W.C.A. Wijngaards <[email protected]> wrote:
> Are there other arguments we should take into consideration? Yes. As I understand it there is _zero_ evidence that MD5 is insecure when used as a digest in DNSSEC. IMHO, this option should be a configurable _policy_ decision, and for now it should default to the conservative "accept" position. kind regards, Ray _______________________________________________ Unbound-users mailing list [email protected] http://unbound.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/unbound-users
