-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Murray,
On 10/23/2012 08:47 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > Hi there, > > Is it safe to call ub_ctx_create() multiple times in a single > process? This should work. Every context is unique, has its own locks, its own backend-process-or-thread if async resolving, and its own config options. > More generally, I've observed a case where a process creates a > distinct ub_ctx for each module in a single-process plugin > architecture, and this appears to interfere with normal operation > once both of them are actually active. Is this a known issue? Not sure, you may be running out of file descriptors if you open many of them (depending on the options). Best regards, Wouter -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQh7ikAAoJEJ9vHC1+BF+NP1QP/26ViYn6iHxs+Zif9lWduHlN C1qUQHzWcOrKt1qDRPPCTKm8NmUlBop3hNAXPC/pPqHaYJnHLrqqwatg/D+fS11p owOdggsLJ7zeyx6rYwS3hQya4SrpQbe+PprmF0uxf4tEnr+elakcY44KU7m1N3Ej 7jM1FQVOvBFUzWqWfZjyZAQcpG8xbcQhVftonvyTIeBGyIO1mZQR4NCz/0iTyUKu CYfeLvpBmozb0I9kgTVrwczHtKZllKthk+H8Adw3bI0rIxiNPZhvnjD5qfhre66w OqB9PFC7ID4Ru8RQBX/8zkx9x3J0/ySwdiUEtWO4kqKUfUPemKjl/Gbi6JMhEyEp O5wgt2f/MJH8xLMNFqKj6roe9Re+L5gpEBb9MFr44MDf8Kh+KWu1ZK2tY0KeygcZ 0t0+cDvzMTqX+NPZ47vHBS0Lk2GZkWlmSVnfUV6zzjXjBcRIr1AZcqb80cg31eyi OM1MzexKeaeZ65aoKBGOCKyq8gMZDDj2Qie/8XWKlnqQyOp06OXn4W9KAcLvw9w1 LBJr7EyXAv1baA2gXwYGe0yZsCo2QsUrFLzDgkZewL/MGtwgYop6qs2r+VVcxDRZ LeZMkHMIxN+uJEgFOqIRjBJp2o5OS9NiQd5GH98K4fC3H1Hbw8bgVud5hLuXOzmR rX9eMtLsyqF1XFp252xq =IhOH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Unbound-users mailing list [email protected] http://unbound.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/unbound-users
