>> "max-udp-size" is almost exactly same as BIND9's.
>
> Very good idea. I note that NSD has two parameters for that, one for
> IPv4 responses and one for IPv6 (to deal with MTU issues). I wonder if
> it's worth the complexity?

This patch adds delective udp-max-size-ip4 and udp-max-size-ip6
instead of udp-max-size.

It seems OK and no performance impact but I'm not sure about use of a
function "addr_is_ip6()".

Regards,
-- 
Daisuke HIGASHI <[email protected]>

Attachment: unbound-maxudpv4v6-allowmininal.patch
Description: Binary data

_______________________________________________
Unbound-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://unbound.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/unbound-users

Reply via email to