On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 12:03 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]>wrote:
> hello list, > > concerning the following entities and the many other entites that > provide dns services: > > cesidian; > unifiedroot; > public-root; > opennic; > > 1. > what is considered better practice for use with unbound: > Best practise is _not_ to use alternative roots. > 1.1 > merging the above individually provided named.cache entries into one > file with the existing iana root-servers.net named.cache; or > > 1.2 > manually adding forward/stub zone entries into the .conf file instead to > resolve other domains that would normally be un-resolvable? > This. > 2. > why ? > Because they provide conflicting namespaces (root vs. alt_root, but also alt_root vs. alt_root), so you need to pick which one you will be using anyway. But I would like to repeat again. Don't use alt_roots, they don't play well (and never will) with unified DNS tree, and there's really no strong reason (no reason at all from my POV) for using them. O. -- Ondřej Surý <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________ Unbound-users mailing list [email protected] http://unbound.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/unbound-users
