[ Quoting <unbound-users+phil@spodhu> in "Re: [Unbound-users] Using libunboun..." ] > On 2013-07-23 at 09:02 +0100, Miek Gieben wrote: > > If you say, 'You don't need it", of what locking and where do you talk > > about? > > The Go code can be relative lock free, but why can I get away with not > > telling > > OpenSSL (or NSS) that it is going to get called from threaded code? > > (I'm ignoring libraries that are actively thread hostile, by doing > things like repointing shared resources from outside the library, such
actually testing this (https://github.com/miekg/unbound/blob/master/unbound_test.go#L99), seems to indicate this isn't a problem (or at least not causing problems). I see multiple threads running with top -H and nothing is complaining... Grtz Miek -- Miek Gieben PGP 3880D0F6
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Unbound-users mailing list [email protected] http://unbound.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/unbound-users
