On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 07:14:23PM -0500, James Starowitz wrote: > To clarify when I say min-neg-cache-ttl im not sure its oblivious but > I mean > > We need > min-neg-cache-ttl – minimum time to store no results for a query > and > max-neg-cache-ttl – max time to store no results for a query >
For what it is worth I have run into the lack of a knob to control the negative cache TTL as well. I am currently looking at replacing some BIND based resolvers for a fairly large site and they are running with "max-ncache-ttl" to force a lower TTL of NXDOMAIN results. I realize this might qualify as feature creep and I have been thinking that not having the functionality could be considered a good way to force people to fix the SOA minimum field instead. I guess this is not always feasible though. Regards, Patrik Lundin _______________________________________________ Unbound-users mailing list [email protected] http://unbound.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/unbound-users
