On Mon, 30 Jun 2014, W.C.A. Wijngaards wrote:
However I am now facing the question: is upstream willing to fully
integrate this change or should I just drop it into FreeBSD base?
I’d be happy to work with you guys on this. Just let me know.
Yes, we would be happy to integrate this.
Is NAT64 considered this important? We would be happy to incorporate
the patch if this is considered useful to many users.
I do think this will become more important over time. I support
inclusion of the code, compiled in but disabled per default.
I have pondered in the past whether or not to patch it into the fedora
or rhel version of unbound. The only reason I did not was because it
was an external patch and would require a lot of maintanance. I was
hoping upstream would merge it in themselves.
Paul
_______________________________________________
Unbound-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://unbound.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/unbound-users
