On 11 Oct 2014, at 06:18 , Dave Warren <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 2014-10-10 13:01, Alexander Dreweke wrote:
>> I had/have the problem that DNS entries and reverse entries do change
>> often and unbound serves the outdated records.
> 
> Wouldn't the solution be to set an appropriate TTL on those records? Unbound 
> likely isn't the only place those records will be cached, they'll be cached 
> client-side as well by most modern clients.

This is my view also. 

The TTL is a promise of sorts: when the zone owner publishes a piece of 
information with an associated TTL he is promising not to change the data 
within that period so that caching will work.

If the zone owner changes data more frequently than the TTL he has selected 
himself then the problem is clearly in the publishing end and not in the 
recursive server end.

Regards,

Johan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

_______________________________________________
Unbound-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://unbound.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/unbound-users

Reply via email to