-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Steve,
On 06-05-15 19:13, DeJong, Steve wrote: > so is this the expected behavior for Unbound? Yes. > It would seem that the final response should use the client subnet > information from the original CNAME response. Why? I don't think I'd agree. //Yuri -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlVLs04ACgkQI3PTR4mhavgl+wCcCfae61Swl+ya3hoWvSPS3IpU ankAnibXZRXJ6PqSj8CsAxd5IZQh5Pvr =UPoc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Unbound-users mailing list [email protected] http://unbound.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/unbound-users
