Hi,Andreas, thank you for reply.
> have you read http://www.unbound.net/documentation/howto_optimise.html ?? > > "Due to malloc overhead, the total memory usage is likely to rise to double > (or 2.5x) the total cache memory that is entered into the config." > > And no, memory leaks are not common in Unbound to my knowledge at least. Yes,I know them. I have read the document. But,because I have felt using too many memory by Unbound Process... I think trying the tuning of parameters of value. thanks. best regards. /// Maru 2015-05-22 22:49 GMT+09:00 <[email protected]>: > > Zitat von Techs_Maru <[email protected]>: > >> Hi,Folks, >> >> I have questions about Unbound 1.4.22 >> >> I began to use recently Unbound. >> before that i was using ISC-BIND. >> >> Unbound to service in a production environment, >> It seems like memory leak as the recursive query increases. >> Is high and utilization compared to ISC-BIND. >> (but,Unbound and ISC-BIND rr-cache-size configure parameter is different.) >> >> Unbound is easy to memory leak? >> Or ,Unbound bugs? >> Or , It is proportional to the cache size value ? >> >> Now "Resident set size" is about 4GB. >> >> It does parameter tuning is bad?..... >> > > Hello, > > have you read http://www.unbound.net/documentation/howto_optimise.html ?? > > "Due to malloc overhead, the total memory usage is likely to rise to double > (or 2.5x) the total cache memory that is entered into the config." > > And no, memory leaks are not common in Unbound to my knowledge at least. > > Regards > > Andreas > > > > _______________________________________________ > Unbound-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://unbound.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/unbound-users _______________________________________________ Unbound-users mailing list [email protected] http://unbound.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/unbound-users
