On 09.06.2015 18:22, Paul Wouters wrote: > On Tue, 9 Jun 2015, Yuri Schaeffer wrote: > > >> Is it really not possible to set negative cache maximum TTL? > > > > I've done some digging in the code and believe cache-max-ttl is > > applicable to negative answers as well. > > But that's not very useful. > > The use case here is for instance when you're hotspotted and you will > get a bunch of false answers or DNS queries fail. You really want to > forget these practically instantly. But we don't want the real cache's > TTLs reduced to instantly, as that would uhm, remove the entire cache. > > We can call it a bug instead of a feature if that makes Wouter happier :) > > Paul > _______________________________________________ > Unbound-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://unbound.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/unbound-users Yesterday I noticed that the maximum negative cache ttl is already in the upstream repo, added on 29.5... So problem solved. ;)
Regards, -- Tomas Hozza Software Engineer - EMEA ENG Developer Experience PGP: 1D9F3C2D Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com _______________________________________________ Unbound-users mailing list [email protected] http://unbound.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/unbound-users
