-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi Yuri,
On 09/06/15 12:12, Yuri Voinov wrote: > http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/app_ntwk_services/waas/acns/v55/c onfiguration/local/guide/55ldg/wccpch.html#wp1353686 > > > > http://i.imgur.com/WSSL3kF.png > > Just FYI. > > So, the question is same. My guess is that the machine is offering DNS resolution in addition to the WCCP service. And the DNS and WCCP do not really interact (apart from DNS lookups or using spare CPU cycles), so you are free to use any DNS resolver you want. Best regards, Wouter > > Note: I've already used route map to intercept port 53 queries and > point it to Unbound instance. But WCCP has lower router CPU load > and more effective. > > _______________________________________________ Unbound-users > mailing list [email protected] > http://unbound.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/unbound-users -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVh+RUAAoJEJ9vHC1+BF+NhUEP/j1ChaHD7+Y09c5CZPu792pL 5V2AauBl1t2ZV9eBn+6FOjCIqqfA/DSLgSCUElFdEkxDc4p/qhdavt8HOdmo/H9b 0YQMYCtOtvSpdbDGQDMoTkmY9bB9b2cZXERNxtpIokDNvLta2RTW96jOWGuhRlyF YHSiO2um1ERe19w75wsayAny4WO5ch4A/c0kx+fGHf7eNqKdCmkf02iTAc4+y7mk mOMibpaBMZvtq7W+9EyOJ3MeZPsyZrQCM33JtmoRl+OSaJMWGYks2rS2osm/SIOo bZaMiZcnObJ759KqVvfvZxVW0F3eC+dfBdX/GFoYyZmgqMUCFxzf0RLhjvnqK7lK pacSaYACrtlzd7GZRnE/t/YrvdepER1n0HKlwuuO0QzZ4qahKCXsgnMBxUie+LJD x5MM+w4qI+jFXLYYEZWD71WRXn1i61xa5Lx1btsLPhfe/rbREXMPCp38we5Aa0AV FFwnfrHVpKtxmq5ogVcT3wxxzZshnpDDX78e0YTybPoBvNkTTRO3yAkk1PPJf9IR t06xfuxcw2SedWlllQTKtdQ06ilRFrRVw/jk6aOxH6TD+7+nnaFa4h2L2B+yUNUQ Ql54jXx7QYtXaz0LrmDuaXRwV2IAdrZioRnC5B2VFewckmopm1CcHbpHbJIAGJGi ZTJkXlaLBF7scCJt+5UO =wOs1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Unbound-users mailing list [email protected] http://unbound.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/unbound-users
