On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:26 AM, Alexander Chekalin
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes, you're right, but I'm not sure if typetransparent solves my question.

It's the right type, nut you may have other issues you're overlooking.
If you're enforcing that private-address range you'll need to to add a
private-domain statement for the local domain. If you're validating
you may need to add a domain-insecure statement for the local domain.
Ex:
=====================================================
private-domain: "domain.com"
domain-insecure: "domain.com"
local-zone: "domain.com." transparent
local-data: "mail.domain.com. A 192.168.17.2"
=====================================================

Chris
_______________________________________________
Unbound-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://unbound.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/unbound-users

Reply via email to