Thanks for the reply Tom, I wish I knew why as well. Right now I am just trying to make my unbound config backwards compatible to not break code that expects an answer for an IP address.
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Tom Samplonius <[email protected]> wrote: > > > ;; ANSWER SECTION: > > 10.36.129.10. 655360 IN A 10.36.129.10 > > > Looking at this answer, I’m not sure why anyone would want this > behaviour? > > Is dnscache trying to dampen RFC1918 A queries by doing this? > > > Tom
