Just like the 'Proficient Reader Research' looked at what proficient readers did right, as opposed to what poor readers did wrong like most of the research before it. Jane in SC :-)
In a message dated 4/20/2008 9:38:52 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm going to try to get my staff to follow their recommendation during our collaborative time: take a piece of student work you think is good (or a lesson you thought went well) and ask, "What needs to happen to make it better? How can I improve this?" IMHO for too long we've looked at our failures and asked ourselves what went wrong and tried to figure out how to "fix it." **************Need a new ride? Check out the largest site for U.S. used car listings at AOL Autos. (http://autos.aol.com/used?NCID=aolcmp00300000002851) _______________________________________________ Understand mailing list [email protected] http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/listinfo/understand_literacyworkshop.org
