I love this discussion! Yes, it is process vs. product...but the bigger  
question that we all struggle with is "What is important to teach?" 
 
 We are not alone in this struggle...remember that series of books out  a few 
years back, that attempted to list what every third grader (or second or  
fifth) should know? And then there is that new TV show "Are you smarter than a  
fifth grader?" which focuses mainly on factual knowledge that we assume a fifth 
 grader should know. And then of course there are those late night show clips 
 where the talk show hosts go out on the street and ask things like who the  
vice president is, and how many stars are on the American flag.  The  humor 
comes from the fact that there are things we 'should' know as adults and  these 
people look foolish because they don't know.  And of course, Ellin  jumps into 
the game with her list of what is essential to teach...and even  there, there 
are some things you just have to know---like sight words and letter  sounds.
 
I wonder if we, in education, (not we on the list) are asking  the wrong 
question. It isn't process vs product. Rather it is "what do we  need to know 
as 
raw materials for what we want to think about?" We need to have  something in 
our schema in order to apply it to our reading to understand,  right? 
 
When I come across this dilemma in my own teaching, I ask myself "How often  
will my students need this factual knowledge?" For example, they will 
regularly  need to know who the president is and how he/she is elected and what 
the  
president does. These things are needed to be able to make intelligent 
decisions  when it comes time to vote. But students also need thinking skills 
to be  
able to analyze the candidates messages, to be able to think about the impact  
proposed policies might have on many aspects of their daily lives and the  
lives of others.  Will my students need to memorize textbooks full of facts  
like 
the names of all the presidents in order and how many were assassinated in  
office? While those things might be interesting to some and even important in  
their line of work, the average adult will rarely need those facts and if he 
or  she does, we simply go online and look it up. Those are the facts I decide 
to  leave out of my teaching.
 
When I hear some of the parents in my community talking about 'rigor'  
...they often are talking about having more to read, at higher levels and more  
facts or vocabulary definitions to memorize. The rigor is all about  
content...not 
process. I think we need to educate folks about Ellin's idea of  rigor. That 
might eliminate some of this either/or mentality.
Jennifer
 
In a message dated 7/18/2008 11:19:47 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Am I  crippling them as learners by focusing on process?  Is it enough to 
give  them strategies to solve problems if they need to be reminded how many 
days 
 are in each month?  I swear I will never go back to the "old way"  of
teaching, but I am concerned.  What do you think?
I hope my  concern is clear,
Judy







**************Get fantasy football with free live scoring. Sign up for 
FanHouse Fantasy Football today.      
(http://www.fanhouse.com/fantasyaffair?ncid=aolspr00050000000020)
_______________________________________________
Understand mailing list
[email protected]
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/listinfo/understand_literacyworkshop.org

Reply via email to