> 1.After Ellin shares Jamika's story, Ellin writes on page 6 : "I realized > that to understand is in some ways synonymous with the development of the > intellect." What is your reaction to this statement? Do you agree with > it? If > so, what implications does that have for our work in classrooms? >
I definitely agree with Ellin. Thinking back to my own experiences with intellectual engagement, they were few and far between. As I try to evaluate why, I'd say it was that I was always pushed for time, never really involved in a discussion with others' opinions, and hadn't experienced the "joy" of understanding. During my masters program, I throughly enjoyed discussions we had about relevant issues, so that prompted me to think and dig a little deeper. As for applications to the classroom, I think I'll have to make a priority for sufficient time (sounds good now, doesn't it?), much more discussion, positive feedback for intellectual engagement, and more expectation for those "ah ha" moments. Certainly this book is challenging me, so I would also add very thoughtful consideration of text used. Jan _______________________________________________ Understand mailing list [email protected] http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/listinfo/understand_literacyworkshop.org
