Vous (Alexandre Prokoudine) avez écrit : > On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 4:15 AM, Pierre Marchand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Vous (Alexandre Prokoudine) avez écrit : > >> Oh noez! Now I see the whole thing :) > >> > >> And is it really just TT table? Not OT ones as well? ;-) > > > > All what's here is searched > > <http://www.microsoft.com/typography/otspec/otff.htm#otttables> > > > > So yes, we could call it OT tables, though historically they are TT ones > > as OT was first known as True Type Open if I've read the right thing. Hm, > > you make me doubt. We won't call it "SFNT data"! Maybe "tables content"… > > > > It's really late now, we'll see tomorrow. > > What I'm thinking about right now is that FontMatrix already has all > chances to become bloated. Maybe it's time to introduce plug-in > architecture?
Yes, it has to be seriously thought. Even if not exactly a plug-in based system, I think clearly modulate the code has to be done. We have already some advance in this process with e.g. the FMFontDB class. -- Pierre Marchand http://www.oep-h.com _______________________________________________ Undertype-users mailing list Undertype-users@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/undertype-users
