Gesendet: Montag, 2. Dezember 2024 um 14:37
Von: "Dominikus Dittes Scherkl via Unicode" <[email protected]>
An: [email protected]
CC: "Dominikus Dittes Scherkl" <[email protected]>
Betreff: Re: German sharp S uppercase mapping
Am 02.12.24 um 14:24 schrieb Julian Bradfield via Unicode:
&gt; On 2024-12-02, Dominikus Dittes Scherkl via Unicode 
<[email protected]>
wrote:
&gt;&gt; No. I want to be able if I have 2 files "Weiß.doc" and "Weiss.doc" on 
my
&gt;&gt; system and copy them to windows, to get 2 files "WEIẞ.DOC" and 
"WEISS.DOC".
&gt;
&gt; You can't have two files called "Weiss.doc" and "weiss.doc" and expect
&gt; to copy them both to Windows and get two files. Why is this case any worse?
Ok, you are right.
Case-insensitive file-systems simply sucks. No gain in trying to fix them.


The files "weiss.txt" and "weiß.txt" CAN exist on NTFS, VFAT, FAT32, exFAT and 
ReFS at the same time. For "weiß.txt" an extended filename "WEI~1.TXT" is 
generated for downward compatibility with software expecting 8.3 filenames.

NTFS and ReFS do support a case-sensitive mode, which is not enabled by 
default. Even if the case-sensitive mode is off, "weiss.txt" and "weiß.txt" are 
considered to be distinct files.

However, this won't work with some software like OneDrive or Sharepoint, which 
do not allow "weiss.txt" and "weiß.txt" in the same directory.

Case-sensitive file systems are supported by the Windows kernel (there is a 
registry setting called ObCaseInsensitive). This is required for special use 
cases like GNU on Windows (GOW), but it is not enabled by default, because it 
would break compatibility legacy software.


</[email protected]></[email protected]></[email protected]>

Reply via email to