I got a complaint from the field that U+02C7 is unexpectedly listed as
in the Latin script in 16.0
Someone investigated and the only changes listed for that property are
that the ScriptExtensions.txt file has been re-ordered.
I checked, and they are correct. I then looked at a difference listing
between the 15.1 and 16.0 versions, and there are extensive changes
beyond reordering.
Is there something we're missing, or did the 16.0 changes list omit
these things?
- Changes to the Script Extension property in 16... Karl Williamson via Unicode
-