� 07:39 2000-06-12 +0300, Klaas Ruppel a �crit: >At 14.27 +0100 9.6.2000, Tom Garland wrote: >>TC304. >>Does anyone know if the following logical operators are globally >>understood or >>must they be translated for each language? >> >>AND >> >>OR >> >>~ (not) >>A symbol that represents the logical not operator. > > From the cultural and language point od view I like to state that I do > not want to be forced to program (e. g. FileMaker) in a way that I have > to mix e.g. Finnish and English (what is the situation now with the > localized version of FM). >When I was studying logics at the University of Helsinki those operators >were JA and TAI (that means Finnish for English AND and OR). [Alain] Right... Here is another contribution I received about this, the actual use of French boolean operators in IBMS's STAIRS and repacement software: >From: "Thibault, Estelle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: 'Alain Labont�' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: RE: (TC304.2308) translating logical operators >Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2000 11:27:25 -0400 > >� tous > >Voici les op�rateurs logiques de la Banque de terminologie du Qu�bec (BTQ) >et la banque de Soquij (AZIMUT). Ces op�rateurs �taient utilis�s par le >logiciel STAIRS et sont demeur�s pratique courante dans les nouveaux >logiciels desdites banques de donn�es. > > >ET intersection > >OU jonction > >ADJ nn proximit� en mot > >PHR proximit� en phrase > >PAR proximit� en paragraphe > >SANS exclusion > >Estelle Thibault >Office de la langue fran�aise
