On 06/21/2000 06:33:57 PM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The standard doesn't ever discuss the BOM in the context of UTF-8, > >See section 13.6 (page 324). Sure enough. Well, there you go: the confusion is officially sanctioned! Peter Constable
- Re: UTF-8N? John Cowan
- Re: UTF-8N? Peter_Constable
- Re: UTF-8N? John Cowan
- Re: UTF-8N? Peter_Constable
- Re: UTF-8N? John Cowan
- Re: UTF-8N? Juliusz Chroboczek
- RE: UTF-8N? Ayers, Mike
- Re: UTF-8N? Antoine Leca
- Re: UTF-8N? Peter_Constable
- Re: UTF-8N? Peter_Constable
- Re: UTF-8N? Peter_Constable
- Re: UTF-8N? Christopher John Fynn
- Re: UTF-8N? Antoine Leca
- RE: UTF-8N? Ayers, Mike
- Re: UTF-8N? John Cowan
- Re: UTF-8N? John Cowan
- Re: UTF-8N? Kenneth Whistler
- Re: UTF-8N? Kenneth Whistler
- Re: UTF-8N? John Cowan
- Re: UTF-8N? Kenneth Whistler
- Re: UTF-8N? Doug Ewell

