On Mon, 10 Jul 2000, Gregg Reynolds wrote: > I imagine this is pretty obvious so I > won't belabor it. For the record, the Arabic language (Classical, spoken > variety) has always accepted both LSD and MSD first verbalization of > numbers. See Wright's Grammar, Book I paragraph 327 (page 259 in my > edition). > > The only remedy I can see for this particular flaw in Unicode is the > introduction of a codepoint to set or maybe swap the evaluation rule for > number strings. We have had this discussion here before. The only thing I want to say now: even if you're right, this is only the case for the Arabic language, and not other Arabic script using language like Persian.
- Not all Arabics are created equal... Michael Kaplan (Trigeminal Inc.)
- Re: Not all Arabics are created equa... brendan_murray
- RE: Not all Arabics are created equa... Gregg Reynolds
- RE: Not all Arabics are created equa... John Cowan
- RE: Not all Arabics are created equa... Gregg Reynolds
- RE: Not all Arabics are created equa... John Cowan
- Re: Not all Arabics are created equa... Mark Davis
- RE: Not all Arabics are created equa... Roozbeh Pournader
- RE: Not all Arabics are created equa... Roozbeh Pournader
- Re: Not all Arabics are created equa... John Cowan
- RE: Not all Arabics are created equa... Marco . Cimarosti
- Re: Not all Arabics are created equa... Roozbeh Pournader
- Re: Not all Arabics are created equa... Antoine Leca
- RE: Not all Arabics are created equa... Gregg Reynolds
- RE: Not all Arabics are created equa... Roozbeh Pournader

