Re: Signature for SCSU

[Markus Scherer]

David Starner wrote:
> I'm implementing SCSU, and I was curious about the signature for SCSU. The
> UTR specifies 10 different signatures and then labels 0E FE FF as recommended.
> Is it acceptable for a decoder to interpret an initial 0E FE FF as the
> signature and decode the others as ZWNBSP,

yes, that is the idea.

> or must it interpret all of them
> as signatures?

no.

i am curious as to which product or application you are implementing scsu for. can you 
tell us/me, please?

markus