[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Why does it say there are three varieties when a 16-bit datum can only be
> serialised in two orders?
The simplest way to think about it is to remember that a MIME charset is meant
to provide *minimal* information for the receiver to convert bytes into
characters. If the receiver gets FF FE 01 02, then it *must* be interpreted
as follows depending on the charset:
UTF-16: U+0201
UTF-16BE: U+FFFE U+0102
UTF-16LE: U+FEFF U+0201
For any given byte sequence, at most two of the charsets produce a meaningful
sequence of characters, since U+FFFE is not a character, but that doesn't
affect charset decoding.
--
Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! || John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau, || http://www.reutershealth.com
Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau, || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Und trank die Milch vom Paradies. -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)
- Re: Unicode in VFAT file system Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- RE: Unicode in VFAT file system Jonathan Rosenne
- Re: Unicode in VFAT file system Peter_Constable
- Re: Unicode in VFAT file system Peter_Constable
- RE: Unicode in VFAT file system Marco . Cimarosti
- Re: Unicode in VFAT file system Peter_Constable
- Re: Unicode in VFAT file system Mark Davis
- Re: Unicode in VFAT file system Peter_Constable
- Re: Unicode in VFAT file system John Cowan
- Re: Unicode in VFAT file system Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- RE: Unicode in VFAT file system John Cowan
- RE: Unicode in VFAT file system Asmus Freytag
- Re: Unicode in VFAT file system Peter_Constable
- Re: Unicode in VFAT file system Asmus Freytag
- Re: Unicode in VFAT file system Peter_Constable
- RE: Unicode in VFAT file system Jonathan Rosenne
- Re: Unicode in VFAT file system addison
- Re: Unicode in VFAT file system Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: Unicode in VFAT file system addison
- Re: Unicode in VFAT file system addison

