[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The line gets drawn somewhere, and
> there's a very strong consensus that Unicode is right in not having
> abstract characters to denote things like bold and italic.
Except in math symbols, where Unicode will soon acquire them. In
math, _sin_ would be the product of _s_, _i_, and _n_, whereas
non-italic "sin" stands for "sine".
--
Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! || John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau, || http://www.reutershealth.com
Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau, || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Und trank die Milch vom Paradies. -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)
