Ar 31 Aug 2000, ag 10:57 scr�obh [EMAIL PROTECTED] f�n �bhar "RE: Same language, two locales (RE:": > I have short topic and some source code on the website trying to depict > why this is not a simple problem: it's easy to parse the header and hard > to know what it means. > > (http://www.inter-locale.com/demos/langnego.xtp) Interesting page, Addison. I was amused to see that two of my AcceptLanguages settings were "nameless" - ga & gd (Irish & Scots Gaelic), both of which I thought were standard tags. Is this a limitation of Java? Why didn't they just include all languages that have tags? `~:.,.:'^`~:.,.:'^`~:.,.:'^`~:.,.:'^`~:.,.:'^`~:.,.:'^`~:.,.:'^`~:.,.:'^`~ S e � n � S � a g h d h a [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________ ,~^~` Ce .sig n'est pas une cig |___|___________||~~�
- Re: Same language, two locales (RE: Locale string for ... addison
- RE: Same language, two locales (RE: Locale string... Marco . Cimarosti
- RE: Same language, two locales (RE: Locale string... John Cowan
- RE: Same language, two locales (RE: Locale string... addison
- Re: Same language, two locales (RE: Locale string... Lars Marius Garshol
- Re: Same language, two locales (RE: Locale string... Antoine Leca
- RE: Same language, two locales (RE: Locale string... Marco . Cimarosti
- RE: Same language, two locales (RE: Locale string... Sean O Seaghdha
- RE: Same language, two locales (RE: Locale string... addison
- RE: Same language, two locales (RE: Locale string... Ayers, Mike
- Re: Same language, two locales (RE: Locale string... Herman Ranes
- RE: Same language, two locales (RE: Locale string... Erland Sommarskog

