[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> (One might respond saying that in Turkish there would
> be a semantic difference, but that is not comparing apples with apples
> since the ligated form would be a ligation of f with dotless-i. The example
> would be rephrased as comparing ligated and non-ligated forms of <f,
> dotless-i>.)
In fact high-quality Turkish text does not include the fi ligature at all, AFAIK.
This would be a property of a proper Turkish font.
--
There is / one art || John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein
