Antoine Leca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> 1) Normalize to single form when possible. Use ISO 639-1 code >> instead of 639-2 if one exists. > > Are you forced to re-tag every bit of data when ISO 639/RA issues a > new code? From what I have heard, ISO 639/MA will not be issuing any new 639-1 (two-letter) codes for languages that already have a 639-2 (three- letter) code. So this re-tagging scenario should not occur and Carl's solution, which is the same as that proposed in RFC 1766 bis, should work fine. -Doug Ewell Fullerton, California
- New Locale Proposal Carl W. Brown
- RE: New Locale Proposal Paul Deuter
- RE: New Locale Proposal Carl W. Brown
- Re: New Locale Proposal Antoine Leca
- RE: New Locale Proposal Doug Ewell
- RE: New Locale Proposal Carl W. Brown
- Re: New Locale Proposal Antoine Leca
- Re: New Locale Proposal Marion Gunn
- Re: New Locale Proposal Antoine Leca
- Re: New Locale Proposal John Cowan
- Re: New Locale Proposal Marion Gunn
- RE: New Locale Proposal Carl W. Brown
- Re: New Locale Proposal Doug Ewell
- Re: New Locale Proposal Michael Everson
- Re: New Locale Proposal Michael Everson

