Re: Unicode on a website

[David Starner]

On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 07:54:15AM -0800, Carl W. Brown wrote:
> First is there a standard for implementing SCSU in browsers?  If not then we
> need to do that first.

Huh? It's a text encoding. You should keep everything through the Content-Type
ASCII (that only uses LF, CR and HT and graphic characters, so it's also legal
SCSU), and properly label the Content-Type, just like you'd do with any 
non-ASCII encoding. The only question I have is whether you put a BOM/signature 
on it. UTF-16 HTML usually goes out with a BOM. Does everything support UTF-8 
HTML with a BOM? 

-- 
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http/ftp: dvdeug.dhis.org
And crawling, on the planet's face, some insects called the human race.
Lost in space, lost in time, and meaning.
        -- RHPS