Sandeep Krishna schrieb:

>   * some unicode characters(or rather code points.) like' F95F' when encoded
> in UTF-8 was being encoded as EF A5 BF, when it should have been encoded as
> EF A5 9F..  in fact many unicode charcters whose encoded form had to had a
> byte in the range (80..9F) were being somehow changed to BF ... thus
> resulting in incorrect retrieval....

Oops, it seems that this particular version of Oracle is only 7,5bit clean ...
Hope they fix it soon, otherwise you need UTF-7d5 (inofficial) as a workaround.

--J"org Knappen

Reply via email to