Sandeep Krishna schrieb: > * some unicode characters(or rather code points.) like' F95F' when encoded > in UTF-8 was being encoded as EF A5 BF, when it should have been encoded as > EF A5 9F.. in fact many unicode charcters whose encoded form had to had a > byte in the range (80..9F) were being somehow changed to BF ... thus > resulting in incorrect retrieval.... Oops, it seems that this particular version of Oracle is only 7,5bit clean ... Hope they fix it soon, otherwise you need UTF-7d5 (inofficial) as a workaround. --J"org Knappen
- unicode + oracle query....... (suggestions neede... Sandeep Krishna
- Re: unicode + oracle query....... (suggesti... Sandeep Krishna
- RE: unicode + oracle query....... (suggesti... Carl W. Brown
- Re: unicode + oracle query....... (suggesti... J%ORG KNAPPEN
- Re: unicode + oracle query....... (suggesti... Sandeep Krishna
- RE: unicode + oracle query....... (suggesti... Kedar Moghe
- Re: unicode + oracle query....... (suggesti... Sandeep Krishna
- RE: unicode + oracle query....... (suggesti... Kedar Moghe
- Re: unicode + oracle query....... (suggesti... Michael \(michka\) Kaplan

