Chris Pratley wrote: >Surrogate support was not turned on by default in Win2000 because the >Windows team was waiting for the standard to be finalized. It was also added >late, so to reduce the potential impact they had it off - a safe bet since >the standard was still 1+ years from completion. How do you turn *ON* surrogate support in Win2K? (Please pardon me if it is blatantly obvious; I'm not running Win2000.) Jeff Hay-Roe Sechelt, B.C. Canada
- Re: lag time in Unicode implementations in OS, e... Mark Davis
- Re: lag time in Unicode implementations in OS, e... Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- RE: lag time in Unicode implementations in OS, e... Carl W. Brown
- Re: lag time in Unicode implementations in OS, e... Mark Davis
- Re: lag time in Unicode implementations in OS, e... Roozbeh Pournader
- Re: lag time in Unicode implementations in OS, e... Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: lag time in Unicode implementations in OS, e... Michael Everson
- Re: lag time in Unicode implementations in OS, e... Roozbeh Pournader
- Re: lag time in Unicode implementations in OS, e... Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- RE: lag time in Unicode implementations in OS, e... Chris Pratley
- RE: lag time in Unicode implementations in OS, e... Jeff Hay-Roe
- RE: lag time in Unicode implementations in OS, e... Chris Pratley
- Re: lag time in Unicode implementations in OS, e... James Kass
- RE: lag time in Unicode implementations in OS, e... Apurva Joshi
- RE: lag time in Unicode implementations in OS, e... Carl W. Brown
- Re: lag time in Unicode implementations in OS, e... Bob Hallissy
- Re: lag time in Unicode implementations in OS, e... Markus Scherer
- Re: lag time in Unicode implementations in OS, e... Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- RE: lag time in Unicode implementations in OS, e... John McConnell
- Re: lag time in Unicode implementations in OS, e... Markus Scherer
- Re: lag time in Unicode implementations in OS, e... Tex Texin

