Jon Babcock wrote: > It seems to me that if not for that, how could anyone > make a Chinese font? Who is going to sit down and > draw a *myriad* or more characters? Since elements > recur, this reduces the amount of labour required > greatly. I too would have bet that all CJK foundries used some form of (automatic?) composition to build their fonts. But, after a few enquiries, it seem that they don't (or they do, but zealously guard the secret). _ Marco
- Re: "Giga Character Set": Nothing but noise Doug Ewell
- RE: "Giga Character Set": Nothing but no... Carl W. Brown
- RE: "Giga Character Set": Nothing but no... Doug Ewell
- Re: "Giga Character Set": Nothing but no... Jon Babcock
- Re: "Giga Character Set": Nothing but no... Jon Babcock
- Re: "Giga Character Set": Nothing but no... Jon Babcock
- Re: "Giga Character Set": Nothing but no... 11digitboy
- RE: "Giga Character Set": Nothing but no... Michael Everson
- RE: "Giga Character Set": Nothing but no... Carl W. Brown
- RE: "Giga Character Set": Nothing but no... Doug Ewell
- Re: "Giga Character Set": Nothing but no... Marco . Cimarosti
- Re: "Giga Character Set": Nothing but no... Jon Babcock
- RE: "Giga Character Set": Nothing but no... James E. Agenbroad
- RE: "Giga Character Set": Nothing but no... Marco . Cimarosti
- RE: "Giga Character Set": Nothing but no... James E. Agenbroad

