well, most of the post is opinion but I agree with a lot of it so that's okay. :-) > This came with Win 95. Unfortunately MS was competing with IBM's > OS/2 at the time and wanted good performance on a 4MB system. While they > use Unicode internally they dropped Unicode support from the user API. This one statement is not true, however, Windows 95 and the rest of the Win9x codebase is not internally Unicode *anything*. michka a new book on internationalization in VB at http://www.i18nWithVB.com/ ----- Original Message -----
- Convincing executives of character code perils J. P.
- RE: Convincing executives of character code... Marco . Cimarosti
- Re: Convincing executives of character code... Brendan Murray/DUB/Lotus
- Re: Convincing executives of character code... Suzanne Topping
- Re: Convincing executives of character code... Tex Texin
- Re: Convincing executives of character code... Tex Texin
- RE: Convincing executives of character code... Carl W. Brown
- Re: Convincing executives of character code... Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: Convincing executives of character code... Alain LaBont�
- Re: Convincing executives of character code... Alain LaBont�

