On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 09:36:08AM -0800, Mark Davis wrote: > The UTC will be using the terms "supplementary code points", "supplementary > characters" and "supplementary planes". The term it is "deprecating with > extreme prejudice" is "surrogate characters". > > See http://www.unicode.org/glossary/ for more information. Thats good, as it is more in consistence with IS 10646. 10646 does not use the term "surrogate". Keld
- RE: string vs. char [was Re: Java and Unicode] addison
- Re: string vs. char [was Re: Java and Unicode] Antoine Leca
- Re: string vs. char [was Re: Java and Unicode] Marco Cimarosti
- Re: string vs. char [was Re: Java and Unicode] Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: string vs. char [was Re: Java and Unicode] David Starner
- Re: string vs. char [was Re: Java and Unicode] Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: string vs. char [was Re: Java and Unicode] John Cowan
- Re: string vs. char [was Re: Java and Unicode] addison
- Re: string vs. char [was Re: Java and Unicode] Mark Davis
- Re: string vs. char [was Re: Java and Unicode] Antoine Leca
- Keld J�rn Simonsen

