Kevin Bracey wrote: > > I find this silly. That creation of such forms would be forbidden I can see > > and agree to. But interpretation? I understand the reasoning when security > > is an issue. But why make it flat illegal? There are many applications > > where such a sequence poses no security danger. you are free to write and use a non-conformant implementation. just be aware of what that means... :-) markus
- UTF-8 Corrigendum, new Glossary Mark Davis
- Re: UTF-8 Corrigendum, new Glossary G. Adam Stanislav
- Re: UTF-8 Corrigendum, new Glossary Kevin Bracey
- Re: UTF-8 Corrigendum, new Glossary Mark Davis
- Re: UTF-8 Corrigendum, new Glossary Doug Ewell
- Re: UTF-8 Corrigendum, new Glossary Markus Scherer
- Re: UTF-8 Corrigendum, new Glossary Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: UTF-8 Corrigendum, new Glossary G. Adam Stanislav
- Re: UTF-8 Corrigendum, new Glossary G. Adam Stanislav
- Re: UTF-8 Corrigendum, new Glossary Kenneth Whistler
- Re: UTF-8 Corrigendum, new Glossary James Kass
- Re: UTF-8 Corrigendum, new Glossary David Starner
- Re: UTF-8 Corrigendum, new Glossary G. Adam Stanislav