Kevin Bracey wrote:
> > I find this silly. That creation of such forms would be forbidden I can see
> > and agree to. But interpretation? I understand the reasoning when security
> > is an issue. But why make it flat illegal? There are many applications
> > where such a sequence poses no security danger.

you are free to write and use a non-conformant implementation. just be aware of what 
that means... :-)
markus

Reply via email to