Re: Transcriptions of "Unicode"

[John H. Jenkins]

At 11:12 PM -0800 12/6/00, James Kass wrote:
>Kenneth Whistler wrote:
>
>>
>>  The CJK radicals supplement, U+2E80..U+2EF3, are the ones that
>>  show a number of specific forms, but those are intended for
>>  special text purposes, as when specifying a radical index in
>>  a dictionary.
>>
>
>The same reasoning could be said to apply to the variant
>characters formed with those variant radicals.  Or maybe I
>am misunderstanding this, special text purposes will permit
>the explicit encoding of a variant radical in a dictionary's
>index, but the dictionary can't explicitly encode the characters
>to which that index refers (?)
>

This is (a) true and (b) expected behavior.

-- 
=====
John H. Jenkins
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://homepage.mac.com/jenkins/