--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Michael Everson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >There is no reason the Chinese or anyone else cannot write this [chemical >elements] with LATIN >CAPITAL LETTER O and SUBSCRIPT TWO. If this is true, why was aproved the U+338E? Note: U+338E is similar to "mg" _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
- RE: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK) Pierpaolo BERNARDI
- RE: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK) Thomas Chan
- RE: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK) Pierpaolo BERNARDI
- Re: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK) John Jenkins
- Re: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK) Kenneth Whistler
- Re: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK) John Cowan
- Re: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK) Pierpaolo BERNARDI
- RE: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK) Ienup Sung
- Re: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK) Pierpaolo BERNARDI
- RE: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK) Julie Doll Allen
- Re: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK) Erik Garr�s
- Re: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK) Antoine Leca
- RE: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK) Vinit Bhatt
- RE: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK) Thomas Chan
- Re: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK) Pierpaolo BERNARDI
- Re: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK) Pierpaolo BERNARDI

