Kenneth Whistler wrote: > > > > > I cannot check now if these characters are included in Unicode as I don't > > > > have TUS handy in this moment. > > > > > > http://www.unicode.org/unicode/uni2book/u2.html (The Online Edition) > > > > > > and > > > > > > http://www.unicode.org/charts/draftunicode31/ (for CJK Extension B, etc.) > > As noted, for now, go through PDUTR #27 to get to the CJK Extension B > charts. This will be updated once Unicode 3.1 is officially released. I noticed the pdf file has some holes where there are no characters (ex: U+20006, U+20016, U+20017, etc). Are these these just places where there was no available font for the hanzis, or do these really represent empty characters in the standard? Just curious.
- Radical Index online? (was Re: Chemistry on chinesse. (... Kenneth Whistler
- Re: Radical Index online? (was Re: Chemistry on ch... Richard Cook
- Re: Radical Index online? (was Re: Chemistry on ch... Richard Cook
- Re: Radical Index online? (was Re: Chemistry on ch... Richard Cook
- Re: Radical Index online? (was Re: Chemistry on ch... Pierpaolo BERNARDI
- Re: Radical Index online? (was Re: Chemistry on ch... John Jenkins
- Re: Radical Index online? (was Re: Chemistry on ch... Richard Cook
- Re: Radical Index online? (was Re: Chemistry on ch... Doug Schiffer
- Re: Radical Index online? (was Re: Chemistry on ch... rscook
- Re: Radical Index online? (was Re: Chemistry on ch... Richard Cook
- Re: Radical Index online? (was Re: Chemistry on ch... Richard Cook

