On 02/19/2001 08:05:49 PM David Starner wrote: >With the Unicode-related functions in Prague growing out of size, I moved them >into a new library called 'Babylon'. It will provide all the functionality >defined in the Unicode standard (it is not Unicode but ISO 10646 compliant as >it uses 32bit wide characters internally) and is written in C++. Eh? Unicode has no aversion to either a 32-bit encoding form (UTF-32 - see UTR#19 or PDUTR#27) or with C++. - Peter --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peter Constable Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International 7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA Tel: +1 972 708 7485 E-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate s... DougEwell2
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Su... David Starner
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Su... Peter_Constable
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Su... P. T. Rourke
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Su... DougEwell2
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Su... Tobias Hunger
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Su... William Overington
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Su... Peter_Constable
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Su... Kenneth Whistler
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Su... Tobias Hunger
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Su... Kenneth Whistler
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Su... Paul Keinanen
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Su... Joel Rees

